For years, Israeli governments have refrained from pursuing targeted assassinations of Hamas leaders, offering them a de facto immunity despite recommendations from the Shin Bet and the Mossad. The prevailing Israeli notion that “Hamas is deterred” led to the abandonment of a crucial counterterrorism strategy. It’s high time for a reevaluation.
Since the commencement of the conflict in the Gaza Strip on October 7, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have escalated their operations in Judea and Samaria, particularly in the Jenin refugee camp, a hotspot for terrorist activities. The IDF’s approach has shifted significantly, with security sources indicating a more assertive stance against armed terrorist groups in the region.
The political echelon in Israel is facing a critical decision, torn between two challenging options: eliminating the military leadership of Hamas or risking the lives of Israeli abductees held by the organization.
Yahya Sinwar’s strategic maneuvering has reached a critical juncture as he exerts pressure on Israel in pursuit of his objectives. Sinwar, the leader of Hamas in the Gaza Strip, is employing a method reminiscent of a mafia boss, aiming to secure a new prisoner exchange deal with the cessation of hostilities as a key condition.
For the first time in its existence, the Hamas movement finds itself confronted with a tangible military threat from Israel aimed at toppling its rule in the Gaza Strip. Despite Hamas’s claims of eventual victory, the key to success lies in the hands of the IDF, with any advances in the conflict weakening the movement’s stronghold.
Israel and the United States have recently solidified their understanding of the necessity to dismantle the entire military infrastructure of Hamas and bring an end to its regime in the Gaza Strip.
This agreement encompasses the nature and duration of future military operations.
Hamas perceives the Israeli abductees in its possession as a crucial insurance policy for its continued existence. While experiencing a gradual decline in military power, these hostages represent the primary bargaining chip that Hamas utilizes to secure the survival of its military leadership.
The Israeli security establishment is deeply concerned about the mounting unrest in Judea and Samaria, fearing a potential explosion of violence. The situation has been exacerbated by the recent escalation of hostilities in the Gaza Strip.
In the wake of the recent conflict in the Gaza Strip, Hamas is altering its attack policy by shifting its focus to carry out terrorist activities abroad against Jewish and Israeli targets.
This shift signifies a notable change in Hamas’ longstanding policy.
The Biden administration is exerting pressure on Mahmoud Abbas to implement comprehensive reforms in the Palestinian Authority (PA) as part of its preparations for the post-war situation in the Gaza Strip. Talks between the U.S. and the PA have begun, but progress is slow due to the lack of a clear Israeli stance on the post-war management of the Strip.
For years, Israeli governments have refrained from pursuing targeted assassinations of Hamas leaders, offering them a de facto immunity despite recommendations from the Shin Bet and the Mossad. The prevailing Israeli notion that “Hamas is deterred” led to the abandonment of a crucial counterterrorism strategy. It’s high time for a reevaluation.
Since the commencement of the conflict in the Gaza Strip on October 7, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have escalated their operations in Judea and Samaria, particularly in the Jenin refugee camp, a hotspot for terrorist activities. The IDF’s approach has shifted significantly, with security sources indicating a more assertive stance against armed terrorist groups in the region.
The political echelon in Israel is facing a critical decision, torn between two challenging options: eliminating the military leadership of Hamas or risking the lives of Israeli abductees held by the organization.
Yahya Sinwar’s strategic maneuvering has reached a critical juncture as he exerts pressure on Israel in pursuit of his objectives. Sinwar, the leader of Hamas in the Gaza Strip, is employing a method reminiscent of a mafia boss, aiming to secure a new prisoner exchange deal with the cessation of hostilities as a key condition.
For the first time in its existence, the Hamas movement finds itself confronted with a tangible military threat from Israel aimed at toppling its rule in the Gaza Strip. Despite Hamas’s claims of eventual victory, the key to success lies in the hands of the IDF, with any advances in the conflict weakening the movement’s stronghold.
Israel and the United States have recently solidified their understanding of the necessity to dismantle the entire military infrastructure of Hamas and bring an end to its regime in the Gaza Strip.
This agreement encompasses the nature and duration of future military operations.
Hamas perceives the Israeli abductees in its possession as a crucial insurance policy for its continued existence. While experiencing a gradual decline in military power, these hostages represent the primary bargaining chip that Hamas utilizes to secure the survival of its military leadership.
The Israeli security establishment is deeply concerned about the mounting unrest in Judea and Samaria, fearing a potential explosion of violence. The situation has been exacerbated by the recent escalation of hostilities in the Gaza Strip.
In the wake of the recent conflict in the Gaza Strip, Hamas is altering its attack policy by shifting its focus to carry out terrorist activities abroad against Jewish and Israeli targets.
This shift signifies a notable change in Hamas’ longstanding policy.
The Biden administration is exerting pressure on Mahmoud Abbas to implement comprehensive reforms in the Palestinian Authority (PA) as part of its preparations for the post-war situation in the Gaza Strip. Talks between the U.S. and the PA have begun, but progress is slow due to the lack of a clear Israeli stance on the post-war management of the Strip.
