Israel opposes the PA returning to control the Gaza Strip after the war and claims that it is corrupt, weak and encourages terrorism.
The Biden administration’s bet on the PA as a body that will manage the Gaza Strip is wrong, something that may lead to the re-strengthening of Hamas in the Gaza Strip in the future.
The conflict in the Gaza Strip rages on, and even as the dust settles, a contentious debate has arisen between Israel and the Biden administration over who will assume control of the territory following the collapse of the Hamas regime.
The Biden administration has firmly advocated for the return of Palestinian Authority (PA) rule in the Gaza Strip, a position vehemently opposed by Israel. Meanwhile, Hamas, despite its weakened state, plans to regain power in the region.
The Biden administration has taken a keen interest in the situation in the Middle East, particularly the ongoing conflict in the Gaza Strip, due to the potential threat it poses to U.S. interests. As a result, the administration is applying pressure on Israel to agree to a humanitarian ceasefire in its battle against Hamas.
While Israel remains determined to oust the Hamas regime and secure the release of abductees, it recognizes the importance of American support. This could lead to a closer alignment with the Biden administration’s objectives.
The Biden administration has taken a keen interest in the situation in the Middle East, particularly the ongoing conflict in the Gaza Strip, due to the potential threat it poses to U.S. interests. As a result, the administration is applying pressure on Israel to agree to a humanitarian ceasefire in its battle against Hamas.
While Israel remains determined to oust the Hamas regime and secure the release of abductees, it recognizes the importance of American support. This could lead to a closer alignment with the Biden administration’s objectives.
The Biden administration began accelerated talks with Israel, the PA and the moderate Arab states to reach an agreement on the political entity that will rule the Gaza Strip after the war. The chairman of the PA demands the recognition of a Palestinian state as a condition for the return of the PA to control the Gaza Strip, Israel makes it clear that the ultimate security responsibility in the Gaza Strip will remain in its hands.
Saudi Arabia estimates that the anticipated normalization agreement with Israel will not immediately lead to the establishment of an independent Palestinian state, but it may pave the way for it. It appears that Saudi Arabia will establish conditions for Israel, which it believes the Israeli government can meet to foster normalization between the two countries.
King Abdullah of Jordan is concerned about the possibility that the normalization agreement between Saudi Arabia and Israel may occur at Jordan’s expense. He warns against overlooking the Palestinian problem.
The Palestinian public estimates that this agreement will not lead to the establishment of a Palestinian state and that it primarily serves the interests of Saudi Arabia.
Yasser Abbas, the son of the Chairman of the PA has begun to immerse himself in the political activities of the PA, recently participating in the Palestinian delegation for talks with Saudi leadership.
At the top echelons of Fatah, there is growing concern that the PA Chairman is grooming Yasser as a potential successor. Meanwhile, on the Palestinian streets, accusations of corruption and nepotism within the PA abound.
The Hashemite royal house is closely monitoring the ongoing discussions surrounding a potential normalization agreement between Saudi Arabia and Israel with growing apprehension. Jordan fears that such an agreement could significantly jeopardize its vital interests and potentially rekindle the notion that “Jordan is Palestine.”
The Palestinian Authority’s security forces actively combat criminal elements throughout Judea and Samaria, even conducting political arrests. However, under the orders of PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas, they do not engage with terrorists responsible for attacks against Israel. Abbas justifies this avoidance by citing the risk of sparking a civil war within Palestinian society.
Israel opposes the PA returning to control the Gaza Strip after the war and claims that it is corrupt, weak and encourages terrorism.
The Biden administration’s bet on the PA as a body that will manage the Gaza Strip is wrong, something that may lead to the re-strengthening of Hamas in the Gaza Strip in the future.
The conflict in the Gaza Strip rages on, and even as the dust settles, a contentious debate has arisen between Israel and the Biden administration over who will assume control of the territory following the collapse of the Hamas regime.
The Biden administration has firmly advocated for the return of Palestinian Authority (PA) rule in the Gaza Strip, a position vehemently opposed by Israel. Meanwhile, Hamas, despite its weakened state, plans to regain power in the region.
The Biden administration has taken a keen interest in the situation in the Middle East, particularly the ongoing conflict in the Gaza Strip, due to the potential threat it poses to U.S. interests. As a result, the administration is applying pressure on Israel to agree to a humanitarian ceasefire in its battle against Hamas.
While Israel remains determined to oust the Hamas regime and secure the release of abductees, it recognizes the importance of American support. This could lead to a closer alignment with the Biden administration’s objectives.
The Biden administration has taken a keen interest in the situation in the Middle East, particularly the ongoing conflict in the Gaza Strip, due to the potential threat it poses to U.S. interests. As a result, the administration is applying pressure on Israel to agree to a humanitarian ceasefire in its battle against Hamas.
While Israel remains determined to oust the Hamas regime and secure the release of abductees, it recognizes the importance of American support. This could lead to a closer alignment with the Biden administration’s objectives.
The Biden administration began accelerated talks with Israel, the PA and the moderate Arab states to reach an agreement on the political entity that will rule the Gaza Strip after the war. The chairman of the PA demands the recognition of a Palestinian state as a condition for the return of the PA to control the Gaza Strip, Israel makes it clear that the ultimate security responsibility in the Gaza Strip will remain in its hands.
Saudi Arabia estimates that the anticipated normalization agreement with Israel will not immediately lead to the establishment of an independent Palestinian state, but it may pave the way for it. It appears that Saudi Arabia will establish conditions for Israel, which it believes the Israeli government can meet to foster normalization between the two countries.
King Abdullah of Jordan is concerned about the possibility that the normalization agreement between Saudi Arabia and Israel may occur at Jordan’s expense. He warns against overlooking the Palestinian problem.
The Palestinian public estimates that this agreement will not lead to the establishment of a Palestinian state and that it primarily serves the interests of Saudi Arabia.
Yasser Abbas, the son of the Chairman of the PA has begun to immerse himself in the political activities of the PA, recently participating in the Palestinian delegation for talks with Saudi leadership.
At the top echelons of Fatah, there is growing concern that the PA Chairman is grooming Yasser as a potential successor. Meanwhile, on the Palestinian streets, accusations of corruption and nepotism within the PA abound.
The Hashemite royal house is closely monitoring the ongoing discussions surrounding a potential normalization agreement between Saudi Arabia and Israel with growing apprehension. Jordan fears that such an agreement could significantly jeopardize its vital interests and potentially rekindle the notion that “Jordan is Palestine.”
The Palestinian Authority’s security forces actively combat criminal elements throughout Judea and Samaria, even conducting political arrests. However, under the orders of PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas, they do not engage with terrorists responsible for attacks against Israel. Abbas justifies this avoidance by citing the risk of sparking a civil war within Palestinian society.
